Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition News and Article Release Issue Number: A665-O189



Release Date: October 30, 2011



Topic: Burma and China -- Roland Watson

标题:缅甸和中国 -- 罗兰德.华生


Original Language Version: English (Chinese version at the end)



Note: Please use "Simplified Chinese (GB2312)" encoding to view the Chinese parts of this release.  If this mail does not display properly in your email program, please send your request for special delivery to us or visit:

http://www.weijingsheng.org/report/report2011/report2011-10/WatsonRonBurma111030XinHaiForumA665-O189.htm which contains identical information.




Burma and China (Remarks at the Forum in the U.S. Capitol: 1911 Chinese Xinhai Revolution -- Review and Outlook)

by Roland Watson, Dictator Watch

October 6, 2011





I have worked for seventeen years as a pro-democracy advocate, mainly on China's Southwest neighbor, Burma. I have been involved in many activities, including years of underground organizing. I have followed China closely for this entire period. My group first disclosed that Burma was cooperating with North Korea, and China, in a clandestine nuclear program.


Burma and China


I was asked to speak about Burma and China. Burma is a military regime in the process of transforming to civilian. China is a civilian regime but which is still grounded in Mao's revolution and the People's Liberation Army.


The main difference is scale. China is massive - therefore, the task of bringing democracy to the country appears huge if not insurmountable.


It is not. With the correct approach - a popular uprising - the people of China, like the people of Egypt and Libya, can be free.


The regimes


Both the Communist Party of China (CCP) and Burma's regime have only one goal: To stay in power. The reason for this is simple. The rulers have great incentives not to lose power.


1. Physical risk: They could be killed, through a coup or by armed revolutionaries. This risk is higher in Burma, which has active ethnic resistance armies, and where it is known that many Burma Army soldiers actually side with the people.


2. Tried for war and other crimes, and then imprisoned, or even executed.


3. Lose their wealth, including of their families.


4. Lose status, or "face." In East Asia, this is often the strongest motivation of all. People will do anything not to lose face.


In summary, the dictators of China, and Burma, have nothing to gain, and everything to lose, from allowing democracy. To remove them, we have to accept this fact.


Regime strategy


Both the CCP and Burma's regime maintain control through imposing severe repression, where all dissidents are arrested, tortured and in many cases killed.


More generally, Burma's regime is now emulating the CCP. The regime set up the USDP, the Union Solidarity and Development Party, with the generals trading uniforms for suits. The USDP is now like the CCP, and if the regime is successful it will be in power for decades to come.


The people


The people of Burma, like the people of China, want freedom. In recent years they have begun to protest. However, for both countries the protests are generally against specific grievances, not for freedom and democracy.

In China the grievances includes working conditions, environmental pollution, and corruption and abuse by Party officials.


In Burma, there was a significant uprising in 2007, against energy price increases and then the abuse of Buddhist monks. In the last two weeks, there have been protests against a large dam at the source of the country's main river, the Irrawaddy, which dam is being built by and for China. The President of Burma has just suspended this dam.


Many people believe this is a sign that Burma's regime is now open to reform. This is not true. The rulers of Burma have two main threats, the ethnic armies and a popular uprising. The dam involved both. The Kachin Independence Army was blocking the delivery of construction supplies. The people were protesting the destruction of the Irrawaddy River, which is a basic national symbol. So, and even though it angered the CCP, the regime suspended the dam.


Also, the other possible source of a popular uprising in Burma is anti-Chinese sentiment. Burmese people are becoming more and more angry about the sale of the country's natural resources to China, and the influx of Chinese people. Suspending the dam was a way to relieve this pressure.


The Arab Spring


Everyone is aware of the Arab Spring movement in the Middle East. In Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Syria and elsewhere, there is only one goal: Freedom. The people are united around this, getting rid of their dictators, and will settle for nothing less.


Freedom for China, and Burma


The people of China and Burma do not yet appear to grasp this, that they have to put freedom and democracy above all other considerations. They need to learn that human rights and environmental protection can never be guaranteed until the CCP and the USDP are driven from power.


Local grievances lead to local protests. But, if the focus is shifted to freedom, this can be used to create national movements, and national protests. Tiananmen Square can once again ring with voices calling for democracy.


Chinese expatriates can do much to encourage and assist the people inside China to redirect their emphasis from local grievances to democracy for the entire country. There are many new activist approaches that can be used, and which I, personally, as a prodemocracy advocate for East Asia, am looking for partners to organize.


Bringing democracy to China is a big task but it is not insurmountable. Any mountain, no matter how large, can be brought down by drops of rain. If the people of China unify around the goal of freedom and democracy, they too can bring down the mountain that is the Communist Party.


Thank you.



Related website: www.dictatorwatch.org


Related photo of Roland Watson:




This is a message from WeiJingSheng.org


The Wei Jingsheng Foundation and the Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition are dedicated to the promotion of human rights and democratization in China.  We appreciate your assistance and help in any means.  We pledge solidarity to all who struggle for human rights and democratic governance on this planet. 


You are welcome to use or distribute this release.  However, please credit with this foundation and its website at: www.weijingsheng.org


Although we are unable to afford to pay royalty fees at this time, we are seeking your contribution as well.  You may send your articles, comments and opinions to: HCP@weijingsheng.org.  Please remember, only in text files, not in attachments.


For website issues and suggestions, you may contact our professional staff and web master at: webmaster@Weijingsheng.org


To find out more about us, please also visit our websites at:

www.WeiJingSheng.org and www.ChinaLaborUnion.org

for news and information for Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition and human rights and democracy movement as whole, especially our Chinese Labor Union Base.


You may contact Ciping Huang at: HCP@Weijingsheng.org or

Wei Jingsheng Foundation office at: 1-202-270-6980


Wei Jingsheng Foundation's postal address is:

Wei Jingsheng Foundation, P. O. Box 15449, Washington, DC 20003, USA


You are receiving this message because you had previous shown your interest in learning more about Mr. Wei Jingsheng and the Chinese Democratic Movement.  To be removed from the list, simply reply this message and use "unsubscribe" as the Subject.  Please allow us a few days to process your request.





Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition News and Article Release Issue Number: A665-O189



Release Date: October 30, 2011



Topic: Burma and China -- Roland Watson

标题:缅甸和中国 -- 罗兰德.华生


Original Language Version: English (Chinese version at the end)









-- 独裁者观察创办人罗兰德.华生(Roland Watson)





















2、 另一个风险是因其战争及其它罪行而被审判,之后被送进监狱,甚至被处决。










































--罗兰德.华生Roland Watson (roland@dictatorwatch.org)







相关网站:独裁者观察 (www.dictatorwatch.org)







欢迎投稿(暂无稿费)或批评建议,请寄信箱:  HCP@WEIJINGSHENG.ORG


魏京生基金会电话: 1-202-270-6980

通讯地址:Wei Jingsheng Foundation, P. O. Box 15449, Washington, DC 20003, USA






倘若阁下希望不再收到类似信息,请回复本信并用 unsubscribe 作为主题(Subject)。