Wei Jingsheng Foundation News and Article Release Issue: A686-W425

魏京生基金会新闻与文章发布号: A686-W425


Release Date: Jan. 28, 2012



Topic: The Way Out for China (Part LI): China's Agricultural and Land Ownership Issues -- Wei Jingsheng

标题:《中国的出路》之五十一:中国的农业及土地公有制问题 -- 魏京生


Original Language Version: Chinese (Chinese version at the end)



Note: Please use "Simplified Chinese (GB2312)" encoding to view the Chinese parts of this release.  If this mail does not display properly in your email program, please send your request for special delivery to us or visit:

http://www.weijingsheng.org/report/report2012/report2012-01/WeiJS120128ChinaWayOut51landownershipA686-W425.htm which contains identical information.




The Way Out for China (Part LI): China's Agricultural and Land Ownership Issues

-- Wei Jingsheng



In speaking of China's rural economic stagnation and widespread poverty among peasants, there will be some people who make excuses again.  They will say that it is due to small production; low quality of the people, and shortage of land, etc.  These excuses are all nonsense using truth to deceive.  The favorite counter-example by these people is the United States: open fields, advanced technology including farmers with Ph.D.'s, etc.  Indeed, these elements are all true.


But China also has broad land, and once the United States also depended on small-scale farming.  Why doesn't China have large-scale operations?  It is due to the land policy.  The Chinese Communist Party has always insisted on its public ownership of land from its early days.  Some people think that this insistence is due to ideological reasons.  But why can almost all other things be privatized, except land?  If we pay attention on the Princelings who got rich by granting land and doing demolition, we have the answers.


That people hate these "Princelings" so much is not due to ideology, but due to all kinds of unreasonable profits and atrocities incurred.  The adult Chinese with more experience know that the Chinese people's traditional concepts are still influential, thus they would go with the concept that "the hero's sons are heroes", and the emperor's son shall be an emperor.  So usually, the Chinese people have more tolerant attitudes toward the official's children becoming the new officials.  However, when people's vital interests and security are violated, it is another matter.


Since the recent occurrence of the "my dad is Li Gang, the high local officer!" incident, people would beat these "sons" indiscriminately if someone made trouble yet yelled some thing like "my dad is so and so".  This new mentality is the accumulation of numerous bullying cases that people suffered from these Princelings.  From their daily lives, the second generation of Communist officials has realized that the government riches are their own private property.  Thus, it is difficult for them not to be arrogant: "our parents usurped others' land and property, and we are only beating people on the streets and making other kinds of little troubles."  To be treated by people violently makes them feel wronged, that they are being made the scapegoats for their parents.


The fact that China's land ownership is unclear has created the opportunity for corruptive officials to make quick profits from it.  The side effect is that annexation of land are blocked and is always in small scale.  There is very little income from the land.  The young peasants naturally tend to give up farming and migrate to the cities to be workers.  The probability to realize advanced technology on a small piece of land is also greatly reduced.  Coupled with authoritarian corruption, the space for rural economic development is reduced, thus producing rural poverty.


So, to solve the bottleneck problem of rural economic development in China, the first thing that needs to be solved is the communist dictatorship at the grassroots level.  Not only must we tackle corruption, more importantly we must liberate the peasants, and give them back the freedom they traditional had.  The second important issue is to privatize land.  Land privatization is not only conducive to the annexation of land for development of large-scale agriculture; in fact, even on small pieces of land, modern agriculture can be developed.  The agriculture in Japan, Taiwan and Europe is carried out on small parcels of land with great efficiency.


However, regardless whether large-scale agriculture or small-scale agriculture with advanced technology is present, people's subjective attitude is vital, even the decisive factor.  Whether in the United States or Europe and Japan, the reason for their good land management is that there are landowners.


Some people have a deep misunderstanding about large farms in the United States and think that it was due to land acquisition.  It was not.  Indeed, some farms and ranches are very large, at least large in their early pioneering days.  However, as in ancient China, with the division during inheritance and sale, land parcels have been getting smaller. Except for some farmers who have the capacity of merging smaller plots, many farmers lease their land or hire people to farm it.  This reconfiguration is similar to the ancient land system in China.


For example, my own land was vacant, so I leased it to my neighbor.  My neighbor makes most of his income by working outside as clerk.  He combined his land with his neighbors' land including mine and got other farmers to cultivate it.  It's like the ancient Chinese landlords.  The farmer who cultivates the parcels does not have very much land, but makes his income by cultivating this collectively larger parcel of land.  In my eyes, my neighbor is kind of poor, while that farmer my neighbor hired seems much more wealthy, with a confident look.


In this way comes the formation of a modern large-scale agriculture, with its efficiency far surpassing farming on small plots.  The grains they harvested were sold cheap and often cannot get a good price, yet they have to ask others to buy their grains, or have to fallow.  In the United States, we often see large tracts of farmland in long-term fallow.  Land lies fallow in the U.S. because it is hard to sell the grain at a good price, while land lies fallow in China because its land ownership is unclear, even though there is not enough food for people's consumption.


The main reason for poor land management in China is due to land ownership being unclear.  Nominally, it is state owned land, yet all levels of bureaucracy have some control over it.  Especially the rural tyrants have the right to adjust the use of the land in any way at any time.  Naturally, peasants do not have any incentive to invest in land.  My land lease contract has written details about how to use and to maintain soil fertility, etc.  That is because the land is my property, and landowners are used to being very careful to protect their property, which becomes a habit.  Yet that seems a little odd for people from China.


Chinese peasants will not protect the land so much, because it is not their property.  There is not much need to care if it does not belong to them. This is human nature.  Meanwhile, the instability of land rights becomes an important source of authority for rural cadres -- adjusting the land rights now and then becomes their major source of income.  In contrast, because of this instability, peasants' investment in the land will likely be only making benefit for others.  Thus there is a general decline in soil fertility, and a lowering production.  Land, this important property, is depreciated because of an unreasonable law of the Communist government about land ownership.


Nowadays in China, much large agricultural machinery has already implemented the same system as the United States.  This illustrates that the Chinese farmers could manage modern agriculture well without others having to "improve their quality".  This success is because the property ownership of the machinery is relatively clear, while land does not have a clearly defined ownership.  All the other advances are not enough to change China's agricultural backwardness completely.  Only when the land is privatized, then modern agriculture could take root in China.  Otherwise it is merely a variant of the collective farms of the former Soviet Union.


History has proved that the public ownership of agricultural land is a backward step to the feudal era.  It had brought massive famine to both the Soviet Union and China.  Even with the means of using modern technology this outcome cannot be avoided.  Although we have known this lesson clearly for many decades, why has the reform stalled after a half step forward 30 years ago?  The greedy nature of the bureaucratic capitalists and the demand for cheap labor by international capital are the root causes that lead to the slow rural economic development in China.



To hear Mr. Wei Jingsheng's related commentary, please visit:



(Written on September 22 and recorded on September 23, 2011.  Broadcasted by Radio Free Asia.)



This is a message from WeiJingSheng.org


The Wei Jingsheng Foundation and the Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition are dedicated to the promotion of human rights and democratization in China.  We appreciate your assistance and help in any means.  We pledge solidarity to all who struggle for human rights and democratic governance on this planet. 


You are welcome to use or distribute this release.  However, please credit with this foundation and its website at: www.weijingsheng.org


Although we are unable to afford to pay royalty fees at this time, we are seeking your contribution as well.  You may send your articles, comments and opinions to: HCP@weijingsheng.org.  Please remember, only in text files, not in attachments.


For website issues and suggestions, you may contact our professional staff and web master at: webmaster@Weijingsheng.org


To find out more about us, please also visit our websites at: www.WeiJingSheng.org and www.ChinaLaborUnion.org for news and information for Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition and human rights and democracy movement as whole, especially our Chinese Labor Union Base.


You may contact Ciping Huang at: HCP@Weijingsheng.org or

Wei Jingsheng Foundation office at: 1-202-270-6980


Wei Jingsheng Foundation's postal address is:

Wei Jingsheng Foundation, P. O. Box 15449, Washington, DC 20003, USA


You are receiving this message because you had previous shown your interest in learning more about Mr. Wei Jingsheng and the Chinese Democratic Movement.  To be removed from the list, simply reply this message and use "unsubscribe" as the Subject.  Please allow us a few days to process your request.





Wei Jingsheng Foundation News and Article Release Issue: A686-W425

魏京生基金会新闻与文章发布号: A686-W425


Release Date: Jan. 28, 2012



Topic: The Way Out for China (Part LI): China's Agricultural and Land Ownership Issues -- Wei Jingsheng

标题:《中国的出路》之五十一:中国的农业及土地公有制问题 -- 魏京生


Original Language Version: Chinese (Chinese version at the end)









-- 魏京生

















有些人对美国的大农场有很深的误会,以为那是土地兼并的结果。其实不然。有些农场和牧场确实非常大,至少在早期开发荒地的时候非常大。但也和中国古代一样, 随着继承分割和出售,地块也是变得越来越小。除了一部分有能力的农民兼并了小地块,大部分农民采取了出租和雇人种地的方式,这也和中国古代的土地制度相似。

























欢迎投稿(暂无稿费)或批评建议,请寄信箱:  HCP@WEIJINGSHENG.ORG



Wei Jingsheng Foundation, P. O. Box 15449, Washington, DC 20003, USA

电话: 1-202-270-6980






倘若阁下希望不再收到类似信息,请回复本信并用 unsubscribe 作为主题(Subject)。